Europeisk kritik mot Durban II

Dagens citat – del 60 (090303)

Än en gång är temat för dagens citat den annalkande Durban Review Conference, eller Durban II som den kallas. I söndags drog sig även USA ur, vilket vi berättade igår. Samma dag krävde en talesman för Nederländernas utrikesminister att utkastet till deklaration ändras. Och idag kritiserades Durban II hårt i FNs råd för mänskliga rättigheter av flera EU-länders representanter. Nederländernas utrikesminister, Maxime Verhagen, sa:

The Netherlands is firmly committed to eliminating racism and related forms of intolerance. We would like to report on our progress in implementing the Durban Declaration and Program of Action. But I am deeply disturbed by the turn this event is taking. The way in which the preparatory process for this review conference has been proceeding suggests that it is unlikely to be a useful exercise, a meeting that will really assist in reaching our shared objective: abolishing racism. I therefore fully understand why some countries have decided not to participate in these proceedings any longer. For the Netherlands, too, the draft outcome document is not acceptable in its present form. It does not focus on the main challenges to address the problem of racism. Instead, the thematic world conference is used by some to try to force their concept of defamation of religion and their focus on one regional conflict on all of us. To all the delegates who doubt the Netherlands’ intentions, I say this: we do want to participate and work together on a useful outcome — but not at any price. We cannot accept any text, which would: (1) Put religion above individuals; (2) Not condemn discrimination on the basis of sexual orientation; (3) Condone anti-Semitism; (4) Or single out Israel. These are clear red lines for the Netherlands. That is certainly not what I have in mind when I call for a more empathic approach.

Och Danmarks utrikesminister, Per Stig Møller, sa:

[T]he preparations of the conference so far give rise to serious concerns, and a consensus based on the draft outcome document after the first reading seems unlikely. Attempts are being made to divert the focus of the conference away from the real problems of racism. Denmark is committed to working for the promotion and protection of human rights. We cannot accept that the conference is being diverted from combating racism and racial discrimination to restricting freedom of expression or any other human right or fundamental freedom.

Från Bildt hörs inte ett knyst…

SvD 2 3 4 5 6 7 Sydsvenskan 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 DN 2 3 4 5 AB 2 3 Dagbladet 2 3 Barometern 2 Dagen 2 3 4 5 6 KrB 2 3 4 TrA 2 3 4 YA 2 3 4


M-H Boccara: Ett anspråkslöst förslag
Ilya Meyer: Bortgången Hederlig Journalism
I Gilboas svala skugga: Gräddligans fatala miss
Israel i Sverige: Gerstenfelds samlingsverk, överst till vänster.
Sapere aude!:Ny bekräftelse: Hamas vägrar erkänna Israel
dibbuk: Sionistlakejens ickevistelse hos Reinfeldt och Kungen
gudmundson: Oklart i kriget mot chipsen
Johan Ingerö: Stor tennis-pogrom planeras i Malmö
Jonathan Leman: Logiken
Henrik Alexandersson: Peace in our time?

Läs även andra bloggares åsikter om , , , , , , , ,

Explore posts in the same categories: Look who is talking, Organisationer, Politiken

Etiketter: , , , , , , , ,

Both comments and pings are currently closed.

%d bloggare gillar detta: